Please see the schedule, which is updated periodically as new application dates are estimated, for details of which chemical or manual methods are used in which area:
Schedule
of applications done. We need dates ahead of time in order to give people a
chance at least to try to stay away around pesticide application time periods
if they have anywhere else they can go:
http://spartina.org/project_documents/2010_Treatment_Schedule.htm
The users and pushers: http://spartina.org/about.htm#staff
Toxicological
profile of the pesticide being used around the San Francisco Bay by the Spartina
Project users:
http://www.pesticide.org/get-the-facts/pesticide-factsheets/factsheets/imazapyr
Spartina
Project Schedule 2009
(pdf)
(html)
Spartina
Project Schedule 2008
(pdf)
(html)
Spartina
Project Schedule 2007
(pdf)
(html)
Spartina Project Schedule 2006 (pdf) (html)
To see which agencies are responsible for pesticide applications in your area, see:
Spartina Project Site Specific Plans 2008-2010 (pdf)
July 17 2006
With
little public notice, today and tomorrow 9 miles of East Bay shoreline
is to be sprayed by helicopter bombardment with Imazapyr, an herbicide
pesticide. We're told it's safe. Get the facts. Go to
www.eastbaypesticidealert.org. Under Oakland's herbiciding hills plan
click on Imazapyr. 48 studies cited, 18 EPA; 1 Forestry Service; myriad
chemical industry Toxicological facts: expect eye and skin irritation.
Animal studies showed stomach ulcers and intestinal lesions. Chronic
toxicity? Oh, yes. Animal studies highlighted fluid accumulation in the
lungs; congestion of the brain; abnormal blood formation in the spleen;
blood pooling in the liver; increase in thyroid cysts. Not yet called
carcinogenic by EPA, "carcinogenic concerns" include: increase in brain
and thyroid tumors and cancers in rats.
EPA says "....terrestrial and aquatic plant species... in jeopardy... use of Arsenal (Imazapyr product)." A related herbicide has high chronic toxicity to fish at concentrations less than 1ppm. EPA notes its half-life is 17 months. When it enters drinking water sources, ozone degrades only half. Drift and resistance, like antibiotic resistance, is common with pesticides. Cross resistance is seen with Imazapyr.
A neurotoxic breakdown product causes nerve lesions and symptoms similar to Huntington's disease.
People needed jobs: manual removal is a safe answer.
Maxina
Ventura
Chronic Effects Researcher
East Bay Pesticide Alert
Imazapyr toxicological profile
Also part of the Spartina pesticides program: Glyphosate products. Monsanto's Roundup is one example of a typical Glyphosate-based product.
What's Wrong With RoundupIn September 2006 the governors of California, Oregon, and Washington entered into the "West Coast Governors' Agreement on Ocean Health" (WCGA). One of several "Action Coordination Teams" is dedicated to ridding the entire West Coast of "non-native" spartina:
Draft Work Plan of the WCGA's Spartina Eradication Action Coordination Team
Whether
spartina is the horrifying invasive the proponents of this
program claim it to be, is debatable. In Willapa
Bay, Washington, oyster farmers are losing their
livelihoods, not because of cordgrass, but because of their local
spartina project dumping the very same chemicals into their
bay. They question the danger of spartina, pointing out its benefits:
"Spartina is a C-4 plant,
sequesters more CO2 than other kinds of
vegetation. Stabilizes the shoreline, keeps the bay water clean and
free of algae bloom."
In
other parts of the country they are deliberately planting the same type
of cordgrass, and treating it as almost
endangered. It has also been
found useful in bioremediation of certain toxic compounds.
As for non-toxic
alternatives, undoubtedly manual removal of large areas of cordgrass
presents a challenge, but it's certainly not impossible. Rather than
spending an obscene amount of money on chemicals, that money would be
better spent on hiring the many unemployed, who are literally starving
for work. Or organize volunteers as they do in Puget Sound for the
annual Spartina
Dig. If it's such a big emergency, how about holding those
responsible who planted the cordgrass in the first place, the U.S.
military? Clearly they have the people power and physical strength to
remove it manually, without declaring chemical warfare on the bay.